For the Engineering Team
Make the boundaries of automation explicit. See what has been authorized, which conditions apply, and where permission ends.
Discuss your workflow ↗Know who authorized every system you run.
Prove it when asked.
3rd party authorization records for automated systems.
No conflict of interest.
The signed record of who accepted the risk, what the system may do, and until when.
The company sets the boundary. The agent acts within it. Each decision leaves a record and evidence for review. When requirements change, the boundary is revisited.
The company sets the boundary
Laws and regulation
Policy, security, and operations
The agent operates within the permitted actions, data, and environments. Explicit exclusions stay attached to its authorization.
Customers · Auditors · Regulators · Courts
Continuously review changes to the agent, institutional policy, and applicable requirements. Bring affected conditions back for review and renew the boundary as needed. The Inventory keeps the record and its review status in view.
The system and its authorization
The system your teams build, resting on the record licet keeps.
What you run
Make the boundaries of automation explicit. See what has been authorized, which conditions apply, and where permission ends.
Discuss your workflow ↗Keep institutional decisions connected to their sources, interpretations, and owners. Produce the record when someone asks.
Discuss your review ↗Licet’s founders bring experience in federal system authorization, operational risk, law, and public-sector compliance. That experience shapes how Licet connects automated systems to human accountability.
Authorization and operations
Twenty years across seven federal agencies, working in environments where a named official accepts system risk in writing.
Law and institutional judgment
Legal practice and compliance leadership across multiple jurisdictions, bringing experience with the institutional judgments behind regulatory obligations.
For teams running a consequential automated workflow, with a workflow owner, an engineering counterpart, and policy or risk reviewers ready to participate.
Together, we define one bounded workflow, exercise it with synthetic or approved de-identified cases, and assess whether a limited integration is justified. You receive a versioned authorization record, decision rationale, evidence-gap report, and proposed integration and measurement plans.